Against source info
Against other-multiple elicitation
Any stkhldr
CBAP提升业务思考能力与分析水平,培养商业头脑。
Against source info
Against other-multiple elicitation
Any stkhldr
Observation:
job shadowing
A (noticeable) / P (unnoticeable)
Reassure non-judgemental attitude
Pro:
realistic and practical
Con:
disruptive and threatening
altering work practices while being observed
N/A for knowledge-based activities
Prototype
Throw-away: scribing on the whiteboard
Evolutionary or functional
Pro:
visual representation for the future state (requirements / designs)
vertical (Storyboarding) / horizontal prototype
Con:
bog down the discussion of how rather than what
unrealistic expectations
focus too mucn on design specification
Survey
target level
pre-survey, post-survey
test and fine-tuning
Pro:
Collect information from a larger audience
Con:
Response rates low
Ambiguous questions-Follow-up queries
Workshops
BS (creative thinking) / FG (qualitative) / WS (gather a group of stkhldrs attended by sme)
facilitator-moderator, scribe
pre-workshop interviews
Ground rules:
off-topic discussion shall be held in check
Pro:
achieve agreement
mutual understanding
Con:
difficult to schedule due to stkhldr's availability
Brainstorming
Foster creative thinking (6-8 persons)
Expection, criteria
Wrap-up (reduction)
nonjudgmental nature
interpersonal politics may impede the effectiveness
Collaborative Games
Affinity map
Focus Group
qualitative research (6-12)
pre-qualified / homogeneous heterogeneous
user discussion
Transcribe and report
Pro:
Save times
Con:
may not be consistent with actual behaviour
Tough to schedule
Vocal participant could sway the results
Interviews
one on one or in group
structured / unstructured
Open-ended / closed queries
Interview FLOW
maintain focus-active listening
take notes or record properly
closing;
summerise the session
Pro:
non-verbal behaviour
Opinion expressed in private
Con:
Resulting documentation subject to the interviewer's own interpretation
Desired outcome-one or more elicitations
Capture outcomes for later reference
Document analysis
Existing documents
Synthesise
Set up logistics
Prepare-conduct-confirm
elicitate-to call forth something latent or potential
Workshops
Indicator-specific numerical, use proxies
Metric-quantifiable level at a specified point in time, a threshold or a range
bureaucratic metrics X
Individuals may act to increase their performance on metrics
Performance analysis
leverage exisiting or elicit
Centre of excellence
Preventive:
Corrective:
Improvement:
Breadth & depth of information provided
Needs of stkhldrs
Reuse:
repository accessible to other BAs
Attributes to describe requirements
Giv
Item trakcing / problem tracking
Record
Escalation matrix
Metrics
number of items, Cycle time
Approver / Reviewer
Rigour: high, medium and low
Criteria: cost
Predictive-formal approvals
Adaptive-approval of iteration
Governance-decision making
Organisational mdlin'
Functionally-oriented
Market-oriented
Matrix Mdl: China reporting to china regional ldr as well as global head.
Identify informal lines of authority, clout, and communication
stkhldr list, map / personas
onion diagram
Core:
affected organisational: help desk
affected external:
Power-interest grid
RACI matrix Accountable (Only One)
Personas
fictional
change strategy-stkhldr related initiative strategy
stkhldr Level of clout
Thorough stkhldr analysis-not once for all
Regulator-organisational rules
Sponsor-approval
Plan-output (specific backlog)
Approach
Top-down:
based on former experience
Bottom-up:
Elaboration, more accuracy
More information needed
Parametric:
Use case
ROM:
Rough, +-50% accuracy
Rolling Wave:
Delphi:
Mutiple elicitation from Domain SMEs and rounds to reach concensus, not really via a vis-a-vis meeting
Combine expert judgement
PERT( Program Evaluation and Review Technique):
3 points estimation (O+P+ML)/3
(O+P+4*ML)/6
SOI
Analogous situation
Archive
Usage consideration:
rationale
Lessons learned
Retro fixed term
Event-driven
variances can be positive or negative > Root cause analysis
Usage consideration:
Trying to assign blame X